Hamlin v. Stevenson

34 Ky. 597, 4 Dana 597, 1836 Ky. LEXIS 132
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided November 4, 1836·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Chief Justice Robertson

delivered the Opinion of the Court,

Hamlin, being twenty-one years old on the day preceding the twenty first anniversary of his birth, was, of course, twenty-one years of age on the day when the plea in abatement was filedj and when the issue upon it was tried.

And therefore, as he then had a right to prosecute his suit in his own name, without the intervention of a prochein amie, the plea that he was an infant when he brought the suit, was not available for abating the suit.

And, moreover, had the plea been sustained, the Circuit Court erred in rendering a judgment in bar of the Suit.

Wherefore, the judgment must be reversed, and the eause remanded with instructions to render a judgment for Hamlin, on the verdict for nine dollars.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamlin v. Stevenson, 34 Ky. 597, 4 Dana 597, 1836 Ky. LEXIS 132 (Ky. Ct. App. 1836).

34 Ky. 597 (Hamlin v. Stevenson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Stevenson
23 A.D.2d 472 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)
State Ex Rel. Department of Financial Institutions v. Sonntag
195 N.E. 601 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1935)
Kostanzer v. State Ex Rel. Ramsey
187 N.E. 337 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1933)
Smith v. Yearwood
73 So. 384 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1916)
Commonwealth v. Howe
35 Pa. Super. 554 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1908)
Erwin v. Benton
87 S.W. 291 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1905)
Linhart v. State
27 S.W. 260 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1894)
Jackson v. Kip
13 F. Cas. 220 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1869)