Hamlin v. State
236 S.E.2d 176, 142 Ga. App. 490, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1667
Opinion
The appellant was convicted of three counts of violating the Georgia Controlled Substances Act. His pro se appeal is directed toward conflicts in the evidence and the methods used in obtaining some of the evidence. The transcripts from both the trial and the hearing on a motion to suppress reveal there was ample evidence to support the jury’s verdict, none of which was obtained in violation of the appellant’s statutory and Fourth Amendment rights of privacy.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hamlin v. State, 236 S.E.2d 176, 142 Ga. App. 490, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1667 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977).
236 S.E.2d 176 (Hamlin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.