Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Hamlin v. Kirnan

Hamlin v. Kirnan

181 A.D.2d 1077, 581 N.Y.S.2d 517, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4795
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 13, 1992
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 181 A.D.2d 1077 (Hamlin v. Kirnan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hamlin v. Kirnan, 181 A.D.2d 1077, 581 N.Y.S.2d 517, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4795 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

— Motion to dismiss appeal as untimely taken denied. Memorandum: The time to appeal does not begin to run until service of the order appealed from (see, Family Ct Act § 1113). In moving to dismiss the appeal, respondent has failed to submit sufficient proof of service of the order. The mailing by Family Court of its decision and order does not constitute the service contemplated by Family Court Act § 1113. Present— Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mancini v. Mormile
229 A.D.2d 542 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Erie County Department of Social Services v. Abdallah
185 A.D.2d 719 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
181 A.D.2d 1077, 581 N.Y.S.2d 517, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamlin-v-kirnan-nyappdiv-1992.