Hamlin v. Kirnan
181 A.D.2d 1077, 581 N.Y.S.2d 517, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4795
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 13, 1992·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
— Motion to dismiss appeal as untimely taken denied. Memorandum: The time to appeal does not begin to run until service of the order appealed from (see, Family Ct Act § 1113). In moving to dismiss the appeal, respondent has failed to submit sufficient proof of service of the order. The mailing by Family Court of its decision and order does not constitute the service contemplated by Family Court Act § 1113. Present— Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hamlin v. Kirnan, 181 A.D.2d 1077, 581 N.Y.S.2d 517, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4795 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).
181 A.D.2d 1077 (Hamlin v. Kirnan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mancini v. Mormile
229 A.D.2d 542 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Erie County Department of Social Services v. Abdallah
185 A.D.2d 719 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)