Hamlin v. Commonwealth
This text of 545 S.E.2d 556 (Hamlin v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UPON A REHEARING EN BANC
By published opinion dated September 26, 2000, a divided panel of this Court affirmed the judgment of the trial court. See Hamlin v. Commonwealth, 33 Va.App. 494, 534 S.E.2d 363 (2000). We stayed the mandate of that decision and granted a rehearing en banc.
Upon rehearing en banc, it is ordered that the stay of the September 26, 2000 mandate is lifted, and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the majority panel opinion.
Judge Benton dissents for the reasons set forth in the panel dissent. See id. at 503-06, 534 S.E.2d at 367-68.
The Commonwealth shall recover of the appellant an additional fee of $200 for services rendered by the Public Defender on the rehearing portion of this appeal, in addition to counsel’s costs and necessary direct out-of-pocket expenses. This [376]*376amount shall be added to the costs due the Commonwealth in the September 26, 2000 mandate.
This order shall be published and certified to the trial court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
545 S.E.2d 556, 35 Va. App. 375, 2001 Va. App. LEXIS 257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamlin-v-commonwealth-vactapp-2001.