Hamlin v. Blankenberg

60 A. 1010, 73 N.H. 258, 1905 N.H. LEXIS 32
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedMay 2, 1905
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 60 A. 1010 (Hamlin v. Blankenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hamlin v. Blankenberg, 60 A. 1010, 73 N.H. 258, 1905 N.H. LEXIS 32 (N.H. 1905).

Opinion

Young, J.

The owner of land may put it to any use which is reasonable, considering his interest and that of the other persons affected by it. Ladd v. Brick Co., 68 N. H. 185, 186. The test to determine whether a particular use is reasonable is to inquire whether or not it is such a use as the ordinary man would make of his premises. Horan v. Byrnes, 72 N. H. 93, 97, 100. The foundation on which the rule rests has been recently re-examined (Franklin v. Durgee, 71 N. H. 186) and the rule reaffirmed, so the further consideration of the question at this time can serve no useful purpose.

.Exception overruled.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Micucci v. White Mountain Trust Co.
321 A.2d 573 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1974)
Page v. Brooks
104 A. 786 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1918)
Moore v. Berlin Mills Co.
67 A. 578 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 A. 1010, 73 N.H. 258, 1905 N.H. LEXIS 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamlin-v-blankenberg-nh-1905.