Hamlet Development Co. v. Venitt
455 N.E.2d 664, 60 N.Y.2d 677, 468 N.Y.S.2d 105, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3377
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (95 AD2d 798).
[679] Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hamlet Development Co. v. Venitt, 455 N.E.2d 664, 60 N.Y.2d 677, 468 N.Y.S.2d 105, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3377 (N.Y. 1983).
455 N.E.2d 664 (Hamlet Development Co. v. Venitt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
De Marco-Stone Funeral Home, Inc. v. WRGB Broadcasting, Inc.
203 A.D.2d 780 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Cambridge Associates v. Inland Vale Farm Co.
116 A.D.2d 684 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)