Hamiter v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Hamiter v. State

97 So. 609, 19 Ala. App. 380, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 215

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 10, 1923

Docket4 Div. 745.

StatusPublished

This text of 97 So. 609 (Hamiter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hamiter v. State, 97 So. 609, 19 Ala. App. 380, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 215 (Ala. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFOpD, J.

The evidence for the' state tended to prove that defendant' had in his possession a part of a still; that it was a can used, for the boiler; that it was filled with mash ready to be distilled; that it had been used and refilled; that there was whisky in defendant’s possession at the time of the kind and character usually made from the kind of mash in the can. The indictment charged both manufacturing whis-ky and possessing a still. Responding to the charges the evidence offered was relevant and was sufficient upon which the jury was warranted in finding a judgment of guilty.

. There js.no error in the record, and the judgment'is affirmed.

Affirmed!

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFOpD, J.

The evidence for the' state tended to prove that defendant' had in his possession a part of a still; that it was a can used, for the boiler; that it was filled with mash ready to be distilled; that it had been used and refilled; that there was whisky in defendant’s possession at the time of the kind and character usually made from the kind of mash in the can. The indictment charged both manufacturing whis-ky and possessing a still. Responding to the charges the evidence offered was relevant and was sufficient upon which the jury was warranted in finding a judgment of guilty.

. There js.no error in the record, and the judgment'is affirmed.

Affirmed!

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 So. 609, 19 Ala. App. 380, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamiter-v-state-alactapp-1923.