Hamilton's Lessee v. Galloway
1 U.S. 93, 1 Dall. 93
Opinion
And,
The deed may be read in evidence; for, the recording does not contribute to the proof of the deed, [94]*94which is established by the oath before the justice; the recording only gives the deed a special operation by the express provisions of the Act of Assembly.
This cause was tried at Carlisle N. P. an the 24th of May 1734, before M'Kean, C. J. Atlee and Rush, Justices.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hamilton's Lessee v. Galloway, 1 U.S. 93, 1 Dall. 93 (1784).
1 U.S. 93 (Hamilton's Lessee v. Galloway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chew v. Keck
4 Rawle 163 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1833)