Hamilton's Lessee v. Cawood & Blacklock
3 Md. 437
Opinion
were of opinion that the party must be confined to his courses and distances, and that he cannot explain by parol testimony what land was intended to be conveyed.
The plaintiff suffered a nonsuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hamilton's Lessee v. Cawood & Blacklock, 3 Md. 437 (Va. Super. Ct. 1796).
3 Md. 437 (Hamilton's Lessee v. Cawood & Blacklock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. Cae-Link Corp.
622 A.2d 745 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1993)