Hamilton v. . Williams

Superior Court of North Carolina

Hamilton v. . Williams

3 N.C. 101

Superior Court of North Carolina·Decided July 5, 1799·Published

Opinion

NOTE. — See S. c. 2 N.C. 139, and the note thereto. See, also,Sanders v. Ferrill, 23 N.C. 97, which holds that where the subscribing witness to any instrument, except a negotiable one, becomes interested in a suit brought by him, his handwriting may be proved to establish the execution of the instrument, whether his interest was thrown upon him by operation of law or was acquired by his own voluntary act.

(102)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOTE. — See S. c. 2 N.C. 139, and the note thereto. See, also,Sanders v. Ferrill, 23 N.C. 97, which holds that where the subscribing witness to any instrument, except a negotiable one, becomes interested in a suit brought by him, his handwriting may be proved to establish the execution of the instrument, whether his interest was thrown upon him by operation of law or was acquired by his own voluntary act.

(102)

Hamilton v. . Williams, 3 N.C. 101 (N.C. Ct. App. 1799).

Pincite

3 N.C. 101 (Hamilton v. . Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related