Hamilton v. WENDETROIT, LTD.
This text of 726 N.W.2d 727 (Hamilton v. WENDETROIT, LTD.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Paulette M. HAMILTON, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
WENDETROIT, LTD., Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 3, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARKMAN, J., dissents and states as follows:
I would grant defendant's application for leave to appeal to address the issues of "avoidability" and "unavoidability" for the reasons set forth in my statement in Wiater v. Great Lakes Recovery Centers, Inc., 477 Mich. 896, 722 N.W.2d 664 (2006).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
726 N.W.2d 727, 477 Mich. 1023, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamilton-v-wendetroit-ltd-mich-2007.