Hamilton v. Washington County Detention Center
This text of 401 F. App'x 814 (Hamilton v. Washington County Detention Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Larry Hamilton, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. Appellee Evans has moved to dismiss, arguing Hamilton’s notice of appeal was untimely. We deny Evans’s motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Hamilton v. Dept, of Corrections, Nos. 8:09-cv-00516-RWT; 8:09-cv-00722-RWT, 2010 WL 2163917 (D.Md. May 26, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
401 F. App'x 814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamilton-v-washington-county-detention-center-ca4-2010.