Hamilton v. Waring
This text of 4 S.C.L. 163 (Hamilton v. Waring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the unanimous opinion of all the judges, that the District Court had properly allowed the defendant to plead the additional plea. That it did not appear that any serious inconvenience would result from allowing several distinct and apparently inconsistent pleas, and the courts have been of late liberally inclined to allow them, where they do not appear to be intended to delay or embarrass, and may be necessary or properly advantageous for the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 S.C.L. 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamilton-v-waring-sc-1807.