Hamilton v. Transportation Security Administration-General Counsel

Fourth Circuit

Hamilton v. Transportation Security Administration-General Counsel

559 F. App'x 214

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 5, 2014·No. No. 14-1000·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenrick Hamilton appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hamilton v. Transp. Sec. Admin., No. 1:13-cv-01311-JCC-TRJ (E.D.Va. Nov. 22, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenrick Hamilton appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hamilton v. Transp. Sec. Admin., No. 1:13-cv-01311-JCC-TRJ (E.D.Va. Nov. 22, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Hamilton v. Transportation Security Administration-General Counsel, 559 F. App'x 214 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

559 F. App'x 214 (Hamilton v. Transportation Security Administration-General Counsel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.