Hamilton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Hamilton v. State

177 S.W.2d 969

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedFebruary 16, 1944

DocketNo. 22762

StatusPublished

This text of 177 S.W.2d 969 (Hamilton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hamilton v. State, 177 S.W.2d 969 (Tex. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Aggravated assault is the offense; the punishment, confinement in the county jail for one month.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved, by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Aggravated assault is the offense; the punishment, confinement in the county jail for one month.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved, by the Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

177 S.W.2d 969, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamilton-v-state-texcrimapp-1944.