Home/Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas/Hamilton v. State

Hamilton v. State

32 S.W.2d 1114
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hamilton v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 120 Tex. Crim. 154 →
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 12, 1930·No. No. 14014·Published

Opinion

MORROW, P. J.

Theft by conversion is the offense; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two years.

There are no complaints of the action of the trial court in the introduction of evidence or instruction to the jury. It is stated in the motion for new trial that the evidence is insufficient. This court is not informed as to [1115]*1115what evidence was before the court, as no statement of facts accompanies the record. The judgment is affirmed.

HAWKINS, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton v. State, 32 S.W.2d 1114 (Tex. 1930).

32 S.W.2d 1114 (Hamilton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.