Hamilton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Hamilton v. State

1931 OK CR 96, 296 P. 1116, 50 Okla. Crim. 252, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 118

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 21, 1931

DocketNo. A-7880.

StatusPublished

This text of 1931 OK CR 96 (Hamilton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hamilton v. State, 1931 OK CR 96, 296 P. 1116, 50 Okla. Crim. 252, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 118 (Okla. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Woodward county on a charge of selling one-half pint of whisky, and was sentenced to imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 30 days and pay a fine of $100. No brief has been filed in support of the assignment of errors.

The evidence reasonably sustains the verdict and. judgment. No new question is presented. No error requiring a reversal is made to appear.

The case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Woodward county on a charge of selling one-half pint of whisky, and was sentenced to imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 30 days and pay a fine of $100. No brief has been filed in support of the assignment of errors.

The evidence reasonably sustains the verdict and. judgment. No new question is presented. No error requiring a reversal is made to appear.

The case is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1931 OK CR 96, 296 P. 1116, 50 Okla. Crim. 252, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamilton-v-state-oklacrimapp-1931.