Hamilton v. State

1927 OK CR 294, 259 P. 664, 38 Okla. Crim. 184, 1927 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 294
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hamilton v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 38 Okla. Crim. 62
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided October 4, 1927·No. No. A-6149.·Published

Opinion

DOYLE, P. J.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the district court of Adair county on an information charging the unlawful possession of one-half gallon of whisky, second offense, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury was sentenced to- pay a fine of $50 and be confined in the county jail for 60 days.

*185 From the judgment an appeal was perfected, but no brief has been filed and no appearance made in behalf of plaintiff in error in this court.

In cases of this kind we do not consider it the duty of this court to go into a careful examination of the evidence to determine whether or not the trial court erred in the admission or rejection of testimony. We have carefully examined the record, and the information, verdict, and judgment all appear to be regular, and we have discovered no error which will warrant a reversal of the judgment. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

EDWARDS’ and DAVENPORT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton v. State, 1927 OK CR 294, 259 P. 664, 38 Okla. Crim. 184, 1927 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 294 (Okla. Ct. App. 1927).

1927 OK CR 294 (Hamilton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.