Hamilton v. State
Opinion
This cause was submitted on the 5th clay of April, 1919, on motion by the Attorney General to affirm same for failure ,to diligently prosecute the appeal. The petition in error and case-made were filed' in this court on the 261h day of November, Í917.. No brief has been filed in behalf of plaintiff in error, and it is apparent that the appeal lias been abandoned and was taken for the purpose of delay only. Tlie motion of the Attorney General to affirm the judgment for failure to diligently prosecute the appeal lis sustained, and ilio judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1919 OK CR 109 (Hamilton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.