Hamilton v. State

716 So. 2d 630, 1998 Miss. LEXIS 301, 1998 WL 319479
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedJune 18, 1998
DocketNo. 97-CA-00347-SCT
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 716 So. 2d 630 (Hamilton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hamilton v. State, 716 So. 2d 630, 1998 Miss. LEXIS 301, 1998 WL 319479 (Mich. 1998).

Opinion

SULLIVAN, Presiding Justice,

for the Court:

¶ 1. James Hamilton was convicted of possession for more than 1 kilogram of marijuana with the intent to distribute and sentenced to twenty five (25) years in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections and fined $10,000. This Court affirmed his conviction on January 17, 1990. On December 14, 1995, Hamilton filed a motion for summary judgment with the trial court requesting that a subsequent federal sentence run concurrent with the twenty five (25) year state sentence. He also challenged the legality of his twenty five (25) year state sentence. The trial court denied his request under the provisions of the Uniform Post Collateral Conviction Relief Act (hereinafter UPCCRA).

¶ 2. We agree and affirm the trial court.

¶ 3. Hamilton failed to comply with Miss. Code Ann. § 99-39-7 which requires a petitioner whose conviction and sentence have been confirmed or whose appeal has been dismissed by this Court to, before filing in the trial court, obtain an order from the Supreme Court allowing the filing of the petitioner’s motion in the trial court. This was not done. Furthermore, the UPCCRA requires:

(2) A motion for relief under this chapter shall be made within three (3) years after the time in which the prisoner’s direct appeal is ruled upon by the supreme court of Mississippi....

Miss.Code Ann. § 99-39-5(2) (1994). Hamilton’s motion is time barred since he filed it on December 14, 1995, well after three years from January 17, 1990, the date upon which this Court affirmed his direct appeal.

¶ 4. LOWER COURT’S DENIAL OF POST CONVICTION RELIEF IS AFFIRMED.

PRATHER, C.J., PITTMAN, P.J., and BANKS, McRAE, JAMES L. ROBERTS, Jr., SMITH, MILLS and WALLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. v. Lloyds, London
734 F. Supp. 708 (M.D. Louisiana, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
716 So. 2d 630, 1998 Miss. LEXIS 301, 1998 WL 319479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamilton-v-state-miss-1998.