Hamilton v. State

136 So. 3d 1290, 2014 WL 2094326, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7623
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hamilton v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16073
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 20, 2014·No. No. 1D13-4988·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The motion for extension of time filed in the lower tribunal on or about September 10, 2013, is construed as a timely notice of appeal of the judgment and sentence in Duval County Circuit Court case number 16-2012-CF-005915-AXXX-MA, rendered on August 13, 2013. As in Platts v. State, 119 So.3d 1266 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013), “[t]he circuit court shall transmit the motion, so construed as a notice of appeal, to this [1291]*1291court within 15 days of issuance of mandate in this cause.” If petitioner qualifies for appointed counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent petitioner on appeal.

Consequently, the petition for belated appeal is denied as moot.

ROWE, SWANSON, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton v. State, 136 So. 3d 1290, 2014 WL 2094326, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7623 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

136 So. 3d 1290 (Hamilton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Platts v. State
119 So. 3d 1266 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)