Hamilton v. State

752 So. 2d 1274, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2733, 2000 WL 276061
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 15, 2000·No. No. 4D99-1626·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Defendant appeals his conviction for aggravated battery and his sentences as a habitual felony offender and prison releas-ee reoffender. We affirm the conviction in all respects, but remand for resentencing.

The Defendant argues that his twenty-year sentence as a habitual offender and his fifteen-year sentence under the Prison Releasee Reoffender Act for the same offense violates the double jeopardy clause. We agree. This court has recently held that a defendant may be sentenced for one offense as either a habitual felony offender or a prison releasee reoffender, but not both. See Adams v. State, 750 So.2d 659 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Melton v. State, 746 So.2d 1188 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Glare v. State, 745 So.2d 1065-66 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). Accordingly, we reverse and remand solely for resentencing.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

GUNTHER, TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton v. State, 752 So. 2d 1274, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2733, 2000 WL 276061 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

752 So. 2d 1274 (Hamilton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Whack v. State
768 So. 2d 540 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Bright v. State
760 So. 2d 287 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)