Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hamilton v. State

Hamilton v. State

578 So. 2d 526, 1991 WL 66197
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 1, 1991·No. 90-2765·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

578 So.2d 526 (1991)

Steve HAMILTON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 90-2765.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 1, 1991.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Anthony Calvello, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

*527 Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Jacqueline Saltiel, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM:

We affirm but remand to the trial court for the entry of a corrected order revoking probation. The corrected order should delete the three grounds which were not orally announced at the conclusion of the revocation hearing, as well as the alleged use of cocaine. We conclude that the finding of use of cocaine was not supported by competent evidence. The only grounds for the revocation should be failing to keep the appointment with the probation officer and failing to perform community service.

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

ANSTEAD, DELL and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton v. State, 578 So. 2d 526, 1991 WL 66197 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

578 So. 2d 526 (Hamilton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

ANDREA D. EDWARDS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2020
Fields v. State
697 So. 2d 1010 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Bowie v. State
689 So. 2d 420 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Fierro v. State
658 So. 2d 669 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Hawthorne v. State
583 So. 2d 425 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)