Hamilton v. State

449 So. 2d 395, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13141
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 2, 1984·No. No. AX-87·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This Court has previously affirmed appellant’s conviction of burglary of a dwelling and fifteen year sentence. Hamilton v. State, 434 So.2d 891 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). His motion for post-conviction relief, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, improperly raised two issues that the trial court correctly denied as they should have been raised on direct appeal and may not now be considered. Christopher v. State, 416 So.2d 450 (Fla.1982).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, C.J., and THOMPSON and WIG-GINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton v. State, 449 So. 2d 395, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13141 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

449 So. 2d 395 (Hamilton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Richardson v. State
491 So. 2d 1242 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)