Hamilton v. State
219 So. 2d 43, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6112
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 11, 1969·No. No. K-484·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the Circuit Court is affirmed. See Hamilton v. State [44]*44of Florida, 390 F.2d 872 (5th Cir., 1968) and Pierson v. State, 214 So.2d 17 (Fla. App. 1st, 1968).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hamilton v. State, 219 So. 2d 43, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6112 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).
219 So. 2d 43 (Hamilton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Huguenot v. State
230 So. 2d 488 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)