Hamilton v. State

701 So. 2d 858, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 715, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 1862, 1997 WL 709680
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 13, 1997·No. No. 91013·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

WELLS, Justice.

We have for review Hamilton v. State, 695 So.2d 436 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997), which certified the same question of great public importance answered by this Court in Paccione v. State, 698 So.2d 252 (Fla.1997). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We quash the decision below and remand for proceedings consistent with our opinion in Paccione.

It is so ordered.

KOGAN, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, GRIMES, HARDING and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton v. State, 701 So. 2d 858, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 715, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 1862, 1997 WL 709680 (Fla. 1997).

701 So. 2d 858 (Hamilton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Puccio v. State
701 So. 2d 858 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1997)