Hamilton v. State Emp. Relations Bd.

643 N.E.2d 1152, 71 Ohio St. 3d 1441, 1995 Ohio LEXIS 3423
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hamilton v. State Emp. Relations Bd.. Read the opinion of the Court — 1994 Ohio 397
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 9, 1995·No. 93-1021; Nos. 92AP-1345 and 92AP-1346·Published

Opinion

This cause came on for further consideration upon the motion of appellee, city of Hamilton, for a stay of judgment pending review by the United States Supreme Court. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for stay be, and the same is hereby, granted.

Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent. Cook, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton v. State Emp. Relations Bd., 643 N.E.2d 1152, 71 Ohio St. 3d 1441, 1995 Ohio LEXIS 3423 (Ohio 1995).

643 N.E.2d 1152 (Hamilton v. State Emp. Relations Bd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.