Hamilton v. State
This text of Hamilton v. State (Hamilton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
JAMES R. HAMILTON, § § No. 49, 2015 Defendant Below- § Appellant, § § v. § Court Below: Superior Court § of the State of Delaware, STATE OF DELAWARE, § in and for New Castle County § Cr. ID 9508006908 Plaintiff Below- § Appellee. §
Submitted: March 26, 2015 Decided: May 21, 2015
Before STRINE, Chief Justice; HOLLAND, and VAUGHN, Justices
ORDER
This 21st day of May 2015, the Court has carefully considered appellant’s
opening brief, the State’s motion to affirm, and the record on appeal. We find it
manifest that the Superior Court’s judgment should be affirmed. The appellant
completed his sentences in 2002 and thus had no standing to file a motion for
postconviction relief under Superior Court Criminal Rule 61.1
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior
Court is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT: /s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr. Chief Justice
1 See Baltazar v. State, 2015 WL 257334, *3 (Del. Jan. 20, 2015).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hamilton v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamilton-v-state-del-2015.