Hamilton v. State

635 So. 2d 912, 1993 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1303, 1993 WL 538145
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hamilton v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 680 So. 2d 987
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided December 30, 1993·No. CR-92-1722·Published

Opinion

ON RETURN TO REMAND

TAYLOR, Judge.

The appellant, Eddie Zote Hamilton, appeals from the summary denial of his petition for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 32, AR.Crim.P., attacking an assault conviction and the sentence therefor. We remanded this cause so that a hearing could be held on the appellant’s allegation that he was illegally sentenced under the Habitual Felony Offender Act (HFOA). Hamilton v. State, 635 So.2d 911 (Ala.Cr.App.1993).

The trial court complied with our directions and held a hearing. The record shows that the appellant’s sentence had been enhanced by a prior conviction for murder. The felony used to enhance his assault conviction occurred before the “commission of the offense for which the defendant [was] being sentenced.” Coulter v. State, 438 So.2d 336, 347 (Ala.Cr.App.1982), affd, 438 So.2d 352 (Ala.1983). The appellant was not illegally sentenced.

The denial of appellant’s petition for post-conviction relief is due to be affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

AH the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton v. State, 635 So. 2d 912, 1993 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1303, 1993 WL 538145 (Ala. Ct. App. 1993).

635 So. 2d 912 (Hamilton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hamilton v. State
635 So. 2d 911 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1993)
Ex Parte Coulter
438 So. 2d 352 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1983)
Coulter v. State
438 So. 2d 336 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1982)