Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hamilton v. Singletary

Hamilton v. Singletary

695 So. 2d 797, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4991, 1997 WL 236131
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 12, 1997
DocketNo. 96-54
StatusPublished

This text of 695 So. 2d 797 (Hamilton v. Singletary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hamilton v. Singletary, 695 So. 2d 797, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4991, 1997 WL 236131 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinions

LAWRENCE, Judge.

Robert L. Hamilton (Hamilton), an inmate in custody of the respondent, seeks review of the trial court’s denial of his petition for mandamus and habeas corpus. We affirm because Hamilton failed to allege sufficient facts to warrant the relief requested.

AFFIRMED.

MICKLE, J., concurs. WEBSTER, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McClurkin v. Parrish Volvo, Inc.
317 So. 2d 85 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
695 So. 2d 797, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4991, 1997 WL 236131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamilton-v-singletary-fladistctapp-1997.