Hamilton v. Scholl

514 So. 2d 423, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10729
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 30, 1987
DocketNo. 87-1014
StatusPublished

This text of 514 So. 2d 423 (Hamilton v. Scholl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hamilton v. Scholl, 514 So. 2d 423, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10729 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Blackburn v. Florida West Coast Land and Development Co., 109 So.2d 413 (Fla. 2d DCA 1959) (There must be some dispute or uncertainty as to the location of the line recognized by the parties before a boundary may be established by acquiescence).

SCHEB, A.C.J., and RYDER and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blackburn v. Florida West Coast Land & Develop. Co.
109 So. 2d 413 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
514 So. 2d 423, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamilton-v-scholl-fladistctapp-1987.