Hamilton v. Ryan Foods Co.

867 So. 2d 1217, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2916, 2004 WL 438667
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 11, 2004·No. No. 1D03-5161·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellant’s response to this Court’s order of December 17, 2003, we dismiss this appeal as premature. The order on appeal reserved jurisdiction to determine collateral source set-offs, thereby rendering it nonfinal. Even assuming that the reservation of jurisdiction to determine collateral source set-offs could be extinguished by the parties’ failure to file a motion seeking such set-offs, [1218]*1218and assuming this left nothing further for the court to determine, nevertheless, the instant order would still be nonfinal. See Neuman v. Neuman, 858 So.2d 1273 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Ponton v. Gross, 576 So.2d 910, 911 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

DISMISSED.

BARFIELD, KAHN and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton v. Ryan Foods Co., 867 So. 2d 1217, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2916, 2004 WL 438667 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

867 So. 2d 1217 (Hamilton v. Ryan Foods Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Altos Pointe Investment, LLC. v. MUNB Loan Holdings, LLC
118 So. 3d 950 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Blue v. Covington County Bank
77 So. 3d 909 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. King
881 So. 2d 729 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)