Hamilton v. Russell
1 D.C. 97
This text of 1 D.C. 97 (Hamilton v. Russell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hamilton v. Russell, 1 D.C. 97 (D.D.C. 1802).
Opinion
were unanimously of opinion that the possession, or the probability that his brother would suffer him to remain in possession, was not such an interest as affected his competency, but went only to his credibility. (See the other points of this case in the report of it in the Supreme Court of the United States, 1 Cranch, Rep. 309, where the judgment of this court was affirmed.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 D.C. 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamilton-v-russell-dcd-1802.