Hamilton v. Russell
This text of 11 F. Cas. 365 (Hamilton v. Russell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
But
were unanimously of opinion that the possession, or the probability that his brother would suffer him to remain in possession, was not such an interest as affected his competency, but went only to his credibility. (See the other points of this case in the report of it in the supreme court of the United States, 1 Cranch [5 U. S.l 309, where the judgment of this court was affirmed.)
[The question of the competency of the witness does not seem to have been raised in the supreme court.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 F. Cas. 365, 1 Cranch 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamilton-v-russell-circtddc-1802.