Hamilton v. Quirk
This text of 475 So. 2d 296 (Hamilton v. Quirk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s judgment on the appeal.
On the cross-appeal, we reverse and remand to the trial court to determine prejudgment interest and reasonable costs to be awarded to the cross-appellant/buyer. See Roberts v. Askew, 260 So.2d 492 (Fla.1972); Constellation Condominium Association, Inc. v. Harrington, 467 So.2d 378 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Kenworth of Tampa, Inc. v. Turnkey Development Corp., 407 So.2d 1063 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); § 57.084, Fla.Stat. (1983).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
475 So. 2d 296, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2139, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamilton-v-quirk-fladistctapp-1985.