Hamilton v. Quirk
475 So. 2d 296, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2139, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15876
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s judgment on the appeal.
On the cross-appeal, we reverse and remand to the trial court to determine prejudgment interest and reasonable costs to be awarded to the cross-appellant/buyer. See Roberts v. Askew, 260 So.2d 492 (Fla.1972); Constellation Condominium Association, Inc. v. Harrington, 467 So.2d 378 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Kenworth of Tampa, Inc. v. Turnkey Development Corp., 407 So.2d 1063 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); § 57.084, Fla.Stat. (1983).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hamilton v. Quirk, 475 So. 2d 296, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2139, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15876 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).
475 So. 2d 296 (Hamilton v. Quirk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Constellation Condo. Assoc., Inc. v. Harrington
467 So. 2d 378 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Roberts v. Askew
260 So. 2d 492 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1972)
Kenworth of Tampa, Inc. v. Turnkey Development Corp.
407 So. 2d 1063 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)