Hamilton v. Polk

D.C. Circuit

Hamilton v. Polk

211 F.2d 51, 93 U.S. App. D.C. 398, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 2527

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedMarch 11, 1954

Docket11878_1

StatusPublished

This text of 211 F.2d 51 (Hamilton v. Polk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hamilton v. Polk, 211 F.2d 51, 93 U.S. App. D.C. 398, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 2527 (D.C. Cir. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants seek reversal of a judgment entered against them in a personal injury suit. We find no merit either in their main contention that the trial court abused its discretion in denying their motions to set aside the jury’s verdict and to grant a new trial on the grounds of fraud and newly discovered evidence, or in the other contentions urged for reversal.

The judgment is therefore

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellants seek reversal of a judgment entered against them in a personal injury suit. We find no merit either in their main contention that the trial court abused its discretion in denying their motions to set aside the jury’s verdict and to grant a new trial on the grounds of fraud and newly discovered evidence, or in the other contentions urged for reversal.

The judgment is therefore

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

211 F.2d 51, 93 U.S. App. D.C. 398, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 2527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamilton-v-polk-cadc-1954.