Hamilton v. Polk

D.C. Circuit

Hamilton v. Polk

211 F.2d 51, 93 U.S. App. D.C. 398, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 2527

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided March 11, 1954·No. 11878_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants seek reversal of a judgment entered against them in a personal injury suit. We find no merit either in their main contention that the trial court abused its discretion in denying their motions to set aside the jury’s verdict and to grant a new trial on the grounds of fraud and newly discovered evidence, or in the other contentions urged for reversal.

The judgment is therefore

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellants seek reversal of a judgment entered against them in a personal injury suit. We find no merit either in their main contention that the trial court abused its discretion in denying their motions to set aside the jury’s verdict and to grant a new trial on the grounds of fraud and newly discovered evidence, or in the other contentions urged for reversal.

The judgment is therefore

Affirmed.

Hamilton v. Polk, 211 F.2d 51, 93 U.S. App. D.C. 398, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 2527 (D.C. Cir. 1954).

Pincite

211 F.2d 51 (Hamilton v. Polk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.