Hamilton v. Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad

97 A. 850, 252 Pa. 615, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 671
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 13, 1916
DocketAppeal, No. 229
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 97 A. 850 (Hamilton v. Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hamilton v. Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad, 97 A. 850, 252 Pa. 615, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 671 (Pa. 1916).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We are not convinced that the learned trial judge erred in submitting the case to the jury, and the judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the court below overruling the defendant’s motions for judgment n. o. v. and for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brandt v. Carlson (In Re Carlson)
231 B.R. 640 (N.D. Illinois, 1999)
Kowtko v. Delaware and Hudson Railroad Corp.
131 F. Supp. 95 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1955)
Rosenfield v. Lehigh Valley R.R. Co.
173 A. 476 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 A. 850, 252 Pa. 615, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamilton-v-philadelphia-baltimore-washington-railroad-pa-1916.