Hamilton v. Pettifor
This text of 165 Ohio St. (N.S.) 361 (Hamilton v. Pettifor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The question presented is whether the term, “survivors,” as used in item four of the will above quoted, relates to the survivors of the members of the class enumerated in item four, or to the survivors of the individual persons constituting that class.
This court is of the opinion that the term, “survivors,” as used in item four relates to the survivors of the class enumerated therein, and that appellant is not entitled to share in the estate. [363]*363The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed on authority of Sinton v. Boyd, 19 Ohio St., 30, 2 Am. Rep., 369.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
165 Ohio St. (N.S.) 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamilton-v-pettifor-ohio-1956.