Hamilton v. Orange Savings Bank
124 A. 62, 99 N.J.L. 503, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 172
This text of 124 A. 62 (Hamilton v. Orange Savings Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hamilton v. Orange Savings Bank, 124 A. 62, 99 N.J.L. 503, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 172 (N.J. 1924).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Judge Dungan in the Circuit Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Trenchard, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Heppenheimer, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Westerhoff v. Citizens Trust Co.
190 A. 84 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1936)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
124 A. 62, 99 N.J.L. 503, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamilton-v-orange-savings-bank-nj-1924.