Hamilton v. Orange Savings Bank
124 A. 62, 99 N.J.L. 503, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 172
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Judge Dungan in the Circuit Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Trenchard, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Heppenheimer, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hamilton v. Orange Savings Bank, 124 A. 62, 99 N.J.L. 503, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 172 (N.J. 1924).
124 A. 62 (Hamilton v. Orange Savings Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Westerhoff v. Citizens Trust Co.
190 A. 84 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1936)