Hamilton v. Niles Bement-Pond Co.

119 A.D. 920

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., who dissented on the ground. that the court committed reversible error in refxising to charge .as.requested by defendant’s counsel, that’if the plaintiff knew that .tlie crane was to be moved he could hot recover, -andl Robson, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton v. Niles Bement-Pond Co., 119 A.D. 920 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

119 A.D. 920 (Hamilton v. Niles Bement-Pond Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.