Hamilton v. Moore

3 U.S. 371, 1 L. Ed. 642, 3 Dall. 371, 1797 U.S. LEXIS 207
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided August 15, 1797·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Bur, Tke-Court obferved, that there was no error in point of fa¿t; nor. any clerical error to amend. The writ bears the date when it was adtually fued out and lodged in the office: there is, therefore, nothing on the record, by which it can be amended; and the objection is fatal;

• The Writ of Error'was, therefore, non-prcjfcd.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton v. Moore, 3 U.S. 371, 1 L. Ed. 642, 3 Dall. 371, 1797 U.S. LEXIS 207 (1797).

3 U.S. 371 (Hamilton v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grigsby v. Purcell
99 U.S. 505 (Supreme Court, 1879)
State of New Jersey v. the State of New York
30 U.S. 284 (Supreme Court, 1831)
Andrews v. Herriot
4 Cow. 508 (New York Supreme Court, 1825)
Smith v. Mead
3 Conn. 253 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1820)