Hamilton v. Moore
3 U.S. 371, 1 L. Ed. 642, 3 Dall. 371, 1797 U.S. LEXIS 207
This text of 3 U.S. 371 (Hamilton v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hamilton v. Moore, 3 U.S. 371, 1 L. Ed. 642, 3 Dall. 371, 1797 U.S. LEXIS 207 (1797).
Opinion
Bur, Tke-Court obferved, that there was no error in point of fa¿t; nor. any clerical error to amend. The writ bears the date when it was adtually fued out and lodged in the office: there is, therefore, nothing on the record, by which it can be amended; and the objection is fatal;
• The Writ of Error'was, therefore, non-prcjfcd.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Grigsby v. Purcell
99 U.S. 505 (Supreme Court, 1879)
The Insurance Company of the Valley of Virginia, in Error v. Moses C. Mordecai
62 U.S. 195 (Supreme Court, 1859)
State of New Jersey v. the State of New York
30 U.S. 284 (Supreme Court, 1831)
Andrews v. Herriot
4 Cow. 508 (New York Supreme Court, 1825)
Smith v. Mead
3 Conn. 253 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1820)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 U.S. 371, 1 L. Ed. 642, 3 Dall. 371, 1797 U.S. LEXIS 207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamilton-v-moore-scotus-1797.