Hamilton v. Moore
3 U.S. 371, 1 L. Ed. 642, 3 Dall. 371, 1797 U.S. LEXIS 207
Opinion
Bur, Tke-Court obferved, that there was no error in point of fa¿t; nor. any clerical error to amend. The writ bears the date when it was adtually fued out and lodged in the office: there is, therefore, nothing on the record, by which it can be amended; and the objection is fatal;
• The Writ of Error'was, therefore, non-prcjfcd.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hamilton v. Moore, 3 U.S. 371, 1 L. Ed. 642, 3 Dall. 371, 1797 U.S. LEXIS 207 (1797).
3 U.S. 371 (Hamilton v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Grigsby v. Purcell
99 U.S. 505 (Supreme Court, 1879)
The Insurance Company of the Valley of Virginia, in Error v. Moses C. Mordecai
62 U.S. 195 (Supreme Court, 1859)
State of New Jersey v. the State of New York
30 U.S. 284 (Supreme Court, 1831)
Andrews v. Herriot
4 Cow. 508 (New York Supreme Court, 1825)
Smith v. Mead
3 Conn. 253 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1820)