Hamilton v. McDonough

954 So. 2d 91, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 5766, 2007 WL 1146551
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 19, 2007·No. No. 1D06-4446·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In the case before us, Petitioner argues that the circuit court erred in denying his petition for writ of mandamus. We find his argument is without merit and is rejected; however, because Respondent concedes that the underlying action constitutes a “collateral criminal proceeding” under Schmidt v. Crusoe, 878 So.2d 361 (Fla.2003), the circuit court erred by imposing a lien on Petitioner’s prison trust account. We accordingly quash the portion of the circuit court’s order on indigen-cy imposing a lien as a result of the filing of the petition for writ of mandamus below. The circuit court should direct the reimbursement of any funds that have been withdrawn from Petitioner’s account to satisfy the improper lien order.

The petition is DENIED as to the challenge of the trial court’s denial of mandamus relief, but is GRANTED as to the challenge to the lien orders, and those orders are hereby QUASHED.

KAHN, POLSTON and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton v. McDonough, 954 So. 2d 91, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 5766, 2007 WL 1146551 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

954 So. 2d 91 (Hamilton v. McDonough) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schmidt v. Crusoe
878 So. 2d 361 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)