Hamilton v. Lanning
130 S. Ct. 487, 558 U.S. 989, 175 L. Ed. 2d 343, 78 U.S.L.W. 3251, 2009 U.S. LEXIS 7655
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 2, 2009·No. No. 08-998·Published·Cited by 16 cases
Opinion
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit granted limited to the following question: Whether, in calculating the debtor’s “projected disposable income” during the plan period, the bankruptcy court may consider evidence suggesting that the debtor’s income or expenses during that period are likely to be different from her income or expenses during the pre-filing period.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hamilton v. Lanning, 130 S. Ct. 487, 558 U.S. 989, 175 L. Ed. 2d 343, 78 U.S.L.W. 3251, 2009 U.S. LEXIS 7655 (U.S. 2009).
130 S. Ct. 487 (Hamilton v. Lanning) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Glines v. Department of Defense
District of Columbia, 2025
Turner v. U.S. Agency for Global Media
District of Columbia, 2020
In re Briggs
570 B.R. 730 (W.D. Louisiana, 2017)
American Federation of Government Employees v. Secretary of the Air Force
716 F.3d 633 (D.C. Circuit, 2013)
Sloan v. URBAN TITLE SERVICES, INC.
770 F. Supp. 2d 216 (District of Columbia, 2011)
Sloan Ex Rel. Juergens v. Urban Title Services, Inc.
770 F. Supp. 2d 216 (District of Columbia, 2011)
New Process Steel, L. P. v. National Labor Relations Board
560 U.S. 674 (Supreme Court, 2010)
Hamilton v. Lanning
560 U.S. 505 (Supreme Court, 2010)
Levin v. Commerce Energy, Inc.
176 L. Ed. 2d 1131 (Supreme Court, 2010)
In Re Pelkey
434 B.R. 26 (D. Connecticut, 2010)
In Re Vollen
426 B.R. 359 (D. Kansas, 2010)
In Re Rabener
424 B.R. 36 (E.D. New York, 2010)
Williamson v. Hall (In Re Hall)
441 B.R. 680 (Tenth Circuit, 2009)
In Re Moose
419 B.R. 632 (E.D. Virginia, 2009)
Pailes v. United States Peace Corps
783 F. Supp. 2d 1 (District of Columbia, 2009)