Hamilton v. Knight
1 Blackf. 25, 1818 Ind. LEXIS 9
Opinion
This affidavit is defective as to one of the defendants below, in not showing that he was privately removing, or about to remove from the county. Ind. Terr. Stat. 1811, p. 46. And as the attachment is against the property of both, and the judgment against them both, the proceedings are erroneous
The judgment is reversed, with costs*
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hamilton v. Knight, 1 Blackf. 25, 1818 Ind. LEXIS 9 (Ind. 1818).
1 Blackf. 25 (Hamilton v. Knight) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Delaplain v. Armstrong
21 W. Va. 211 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1882)
Organ v. State
1 Morr. St. Cas. 684 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1872)
McCann v. State
1 Morr. St. Cas. 399 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1872)
Boles v. State
1 Morr. St. Cas. 476 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1872)
Bilansky v. State
3 Minn. 427 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1859)
Cornelius v. State
7 Ark. 782 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1852)
Cannon v. State
3 Tex. 31 (Texas Supreme Court, 1848)