Hamilton v. International Dairy Queen, Inc.

346 N.W.2d 138, 1984 Minn. LEXIS 1301
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided March 30, 1984·No. C5-83-199·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinions

SCOTT, Justice.

The representative of the Commissioner of the State of Minnesota Department of Economic Security found that the employee “was discharged for reasons amounting to misconduct under the Minnesota Employment Service Law.” He was then disqualified as a recipient of unemployment compensation benefits.

We reverse that determination, based upon our decision in Windsperger v. Broadway Liquor Outlet, 346 N.W.2d 142, filed contemporaneously with this decision. The reasoning of that case precludes the denial of said benefits to this employee.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton v. International Dairy Queen, Inc., 346 N.W.2d 138, 1984 Minn. LEXIS 1301 (Mich. 1984).

346 N.W.2d 138 (Hamilton v. International Dairy Queen, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Isse v. Alamo Rent-A-Car
590 N.W.2d 137 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1999)
Mankato Lutheran Home v. Miller
358 N.W.2d 96 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1984)
Hines v. Sheraton Ritz Hotel
349 N.W.2d 329 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1984)
Flannigan v. Meadow Lane Health Care Center
347 N.W.2d 852 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1984)
Windsperger v. Broadway Liquor Outlet
346 N.W.2d 142 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1984)