Home/Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court/Hamilton v. Ingraham

Hamilton v. Ingraham

121 Mass. 562, 1877 Mass. LEXIS 51
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided January 18, 1877·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

The mistake in the writ was rightly allowed to be amended. McIniffe v. Wheelock, 1 Gray, 600. Fay v. Hayden,, 7 Gray, 41. Hart v. Waitt, 3 Allen, 532. Austin v. Lamar Ins. Co. 108 Mass. 338. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton v. Ingraham, 121 Mass. 562, 1877 Mass. LEXIS 51 (Mass. 1877).

121 Mass. 562 (Hamilton v. Ingraham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moriarty v. King
57 N.E.2d 633 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1944)
Lee v. Barnstead
9 Mass. App. Div. 93 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1944)
Inhabitants of Dover-Foxcroft v. Inhabitants of Lincoln
192 A. 700 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1937)
Perry v. Sapeilo
8 N.E.2d 810 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1937)
O'Brien v. McManama
183 N.E. 176 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1932)
Barker Co. v. Central West Investment Co.
105 N.W. 985 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1905)
Norton v. City of Dover
14 F. 106 (U.S. Circuit Court, 1882)