Hamilton v. Holcomb

1 Johns. Cas. 29
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1799
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 Johns. Cas. 29 (Hamilton v. Holcomb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hamilton v. Holcomb, 1 Johns. Cas. 29 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The case of Newnham v. Law, which has. been cited, is in point. Courts of late, have adopted the practice of granting all amendments, to which the party would have been entitled, as of course, provided it be of no prejudice to the other party. The rule must be made absolute on payment of the costs of this motion, and of the writ of error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Danforth v. Danforth
111 Ill. 236 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1884)
Brown v. The Cadmus
4 F. Cas. 360 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1856)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Johns. Cas. 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamilton-v-holcomb-nysupct-1799.