Hamilton v. Holcomb
1 Johns. Cas. 29
Opinion
The case of Newnham v. Law, which has. been cited, is in point. Courts of late, have adopted the practice of granting all amendments, to which the party would have been entitled, as of course, provided it be of no prejudice to the other party. The rule must be made absolute on payment of the costs of this motion, and of the writ of error.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hamilton v. Holcomb, 1 Johns. Cas. 29 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).
1 Johns. Cas. 29 (Hamilton v. Holcomb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Danforth v. Danforth
111 Ill. 236 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1884)
Brown v. The Cadmus
4 F. Cas. 360 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1856)