Hamilton v. Hodgkiss
1 Tenn. 109
Opinion
The practice has been settled to dismiss appeals for the want of reasons, but this is founded in the presumption that no reasons were filed in the court below, but when this presumption is destroyed by proof that they were filed, surely this court would do wrong to dismiss the appeal, and thus prevent an examination of the cause before the superior court, which is the object of an appeal.
If sufficient cause be shewn by affidavit, or otherwise a certiorari ought to issue
Motion to dismiss overuled and a certiorari awarded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hamilton v. Hodgkiss, 1 Tenn. 109 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1805).
1 Tenn. 109 (Hamilton v. Hodgkiss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McGhee v. Grady
80 Tenn. 89 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1883)
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Ordway
76 Tenn. 558 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1881)