Hamilton v. Hamilton
448 So. 2d 105
This text of 448 So. 2d 105 (Hamilton v. Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hamilton v. Hamilton, 448 So. 2d 105 (La. 1984).
Opinion
Petition for Concursus In re James W. HAMILTON
v.
Delia Johnson HAMILTON, Maude Hamilton Davis, and Sandra Hardy.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Denied. The result is correct.
CALOGERO, DENNIS and LEMMON, J.J., concur, being of the opinion that the statute in question prohibits recovery by a beneficiary adjudged guilty of an intentional act which results in his criminal responsibility for the insured's death.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
448 So. 2d 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamilton-v-hamilton-la-1984.