Hamilton v. Goddard

25 N.E. 543, 125 Ind. 600, 1890 Ind. LEXIS 502
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided October 16, 1890·No. No. 14,445·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Olds, J.

— The appellant filed a claim against the appellee’s decedent’s estate. In the circuit court the appellant filed an amended third paragraph of complaint, and it appears that a demurrer was sustained to the same, and the appellant withdrew the first and second paragraphs and refused to again amend the third, and suffered judgment to be rendered against him.

No question is presented by the record. The record recites that a demurrer had been sustained to the amended third paragraph of the complaint, but there is no record of any ruling on such demurrer, and no-exceptions to any such ruling reserved, hence no question is presented by the record.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Berkshire, C. J., did not sit in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton v. Goddard, 25 N.E. 543, 125 Ind. 600, 1890 Ind. LEXIS 502 (Ind. 1890).

25 N.E. 543 (Hamilton v. Goddard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shapleigh Hardware Co. v. Spiro
106 So. 209 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1925)
Falender v. Atkins
94 N.E. 323 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1911)